Wheel not included

  • BridgestoneTuranza EL400-02 RFT
  • BridgestoneTuranza EL400-02 RFT

Does this tire fit your vehicle?

Tires are designed specifically for different vehicles and wheel sizes. Tell us about your vehicle or the specific size you want so we can help find the right tires for you.

The Turanza EL400-02 RFT is Bridgestone's Standard Touring All-Season self-supporting run-flat tire developed as Original Equipment (O.E.) for Lexus IS250C and IS350C models, as well as all-wheel drive Toyota Sienna* minivans as of the 2011 model year. The Turanza EL400-02 RFT is designed to combine temporary extended mobility (for a distance of at least 50 miles at up to 50 mph even after a puncture has allowed complete air pressure loss) with dry, wet and wintertime traction, even in light snow.

Turanza EL400-02 RFT tires feature an all-season rubber compound molded into a symmetric tread design with straight circumferential grooves to balance dry and wet road traction with noise comfort and hydroplaning resistance. The tire's internal structure includes twin steel belts reinforced by spirally wrapped nylon to blend high-speed durability with uniform ride quality. The structure of the Turanza EL400-02 RFT features Bridgestone Side Support Run-Flat technology-reinforced sidewalls specifically tuned to support the vehicle in the case a puncture causes complete loss of air pressure.

*The P235/55RF18 99T-sized Turanza EL400-02 RFT developed for Toyota all-wheel drive Sienna minivans beginning with the 2011 model year is Bridgestone's first run-flat tire to arrive in the U.S. that features their 3rd generation run-flat tire (3G RFT) technology. The 3G RFT tires are designed to offer almost the same riding comfort as conventional tires while continuing to provide temporary extended mobility in the event a puncture allows complete air loss. While Bridgestone's "3G" identification isn't molded on the tire's sidewall or printed on its label, it is confirmed by the cooling fin technology molded into the sidewalls as shown in the accompanying photos.

Though they cannot be labeled as run-flat tires, tires branded with MOExtended or MOE on their sidewalls offer run-flat-like characteristics by delivering limited temporary extended mobility after a puncture results in complete loss of air pressure. Because MOExtended or MOE tires do not have the same speed and distance endurance of conventional run-flat tires, they should not be substituted in any situation where a conventional run-flat tire is required. To confirm what your vehicle needs, check our Original Equipment tire listing for your year, make and model or see your vehicle owner's manual.

Related Information: Learn more about MOExtended/MOE tires here.

Ratings Charts & Reviews BridgestoneTuranza EL400-02 RFT

Tire Category: Standard Touring All-Season

Consumer Surveys

 
Best in Category
Miles Reported
Recommended
Treadwear
Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT
Fair
100%
1.9M
3.6 - Poor
6.6 - Good
6.5 Hydroplaning Resistance
6.7 Wet Traction
7.5 - Good
7.3 Corner Stability
7.7 Dry Traction
7.3 Steering Response
4.5 - Poor
5.1 Light Snow Traction
4.4 Deep Snow Traction
3.9 Ice Traction
6.2 - Fair
6.4 Ride Quality
6.0 Noise
3.8 - Poor

Bridgestone Reviews

Feedback patterns show the Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT delivers strong dry traction (scores 7-10) with responsive handling, aligning well with its all-season touring role. Treadwear emerges as a major concern, with frequent low scores (0-3) indicating premature wear. Comfort receives mixed feedback, with some noting harsh ride quality and elevated noise levels (scores 2-6). Winter traction shows limitations in snow/ice conditions (scores 0-5), though some report adequate light snow capability. Wet performance splits opinions - decent hydroplaning resistance (scores 5-8) contrasts with occasional traction concerns in heavy rain. While dry performance satisfies most drivers, the combination of short tread life and comfort issues tempers overall satisfaction for year-round use.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more

Customers Like:

Customers Dislike:

73 reviews mention "Dry Traction"

  • 57 positive
  • 16 negative

Customers praise dry traction with most ratings between 7-10, including many 9s and 10s, highlighting confident grip and responsive handling. A few lower scores note occasional concerns, but performance excels in standard touring all-season conditions.

November 30, 2010
4.4 out of 5 Star Rating
4.4 out of 5

...They stick nicely in corners and with dry pavement riding, there are no issues...

I just recently got my 2011 Sienna AWD and love it. I know many will comment that the run flats are horrible, expensive, loud, etc...well, for those who comment (or haven't) and/or have never really tried them (especially generation 3), I can say that they are not that loud, are quite comfortable, and here are only about $200.00/tire...the bottom line is that they are nice tires with a HUGE safety factor built in. I have no problems with them thus far and it's nice to know my tire cannot blow out...



Ride comfort is top notch and they are not much (if any) louder than any other tire I've ever had. They stick nicely in corners and with dry pavement riding, there are no issues. I also drove in the rain the other day...they were like glue...no issues...sure, it's nice to have an AWD minivan....but, it's even nicer to have a quality tire.



Run flats have come a far way...Toyota Sienna AWD customers are now benefitting from technology gains...this is a quality tire that you can feel safe with!

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota Sienna AWD
Miles Driven on Tires: 400
Driving Conditions: Mostly City
Location: Baltimore, MD
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

69 reviews mention "Wet Traction"

  • 33 positive
  • 36 negative

Mixed wet traction scores (many 0-6) show unacceptable performance. Customers report mediocre wet traction, sliding, and hydroplaning concerns despite some 8-10 ratings.

November 07, 2017
(Verified Purchase)
1.6 out of 5 Star Rating
1.6 out of 5

...Horrrrribbbleee in the rain, limits speed to under 55mph or the whole car starts to shimmy around...

Not even at 25,000 miles and these tires are bald as a racing slick and loud as a screaming eagle at 70mph. Horrrrribbbleee in the rain, limits speed to under 55mph or the whole car starts to shimmy around. Not sure what BMW was thinking putting these on their cars.

Vehicle: 2016 BMW 228i Coupe Base Model
Miles Driven on Tires: 24,500
Driving Conditions: Mostly Highway
Location: CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
Driving Style: Spirited

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

August 08, 2013
1.9 out of 5 Star Rating
1.9 out of 5

...Any ice, rain or snow on highway causes hydroplaning have to drive much slower than everyone else...

worn out at 34k, unable to go up a hill with over 4 inches of snow. Any ice, rain or snow on highway causes hydroplaning have to drive much slower than everyone else. Toyota sent out a warning not to tow or load to weight capacity with these original tires. Bridgestone makes unsafe terrible run flat tires. Beware of Toyota for using them.

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota Sienna AWD XLE
Miles Driven on Tires: 39,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: BELLEVUE, NE
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

April 27, 2020
1.8 out of 5 Star Rating
1.8 out of 5

...traction on wet roads or even a hint of snow was horrible. We even had an expensive accident from the terrible traction after a light dusting of snow on the ground, going very slowly, it slid into a curb and cost me plenty of money replacing an A-arm...

235/55R18 RunFlat (RFT) came with my new 2019 Toyota Sienna XLE.
Worst tire I've ever owned. Even brand new, traction on wet roads or even a hint of snow was horrible. We even had an expensive accident from the terrible traction after a light dusting of snow on the ground, going very slowly, it slid into a curb and cost me plenty of money replacing an A-arm.
Even after 15k miles, these didn't feel very good. I should have replaced them sooner, but I ran them until one blew out at 32k miles.

I wish I had replaced these the moment I took possession of my new vehicle, I will never buy another set of Bridgestone if I can help it, ever, ever again.
Replacing with a high-end continental - not run-flats, and I hope to enjoy my vehicle much more once these terrible tires are out of my life.

Vehicle: 2019 Toyota Sienna AWD XLE
Miles Driven on Tires: 32,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: THORNTON, CO
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

58 reviews mention "Winter Traction"

  • 16 positive
  • 42 negative

Customers report poor winter traction, with many scores between 0-5. Frequent mentions of slippery snow performance, lack of traction, and getting stuck in heavy snow. Some higher scores (7-10) exist but are rare.

January 26, 2017
2.5 out of 5 Star Rating
2.5 out of 5

...This vehicle is used for 4 to 5 ski trips to Mammoth Mountain every season and the snow and ice traction of these tires is absolutely awful. Last December my driveway had a light coat of packed snow on it and my minivan slid down the driveway with the ABS going off madly and the car sliding into the street like a sled...

These tires were OEM on my 15 Sienna Limited AWD. Wet and dry traction were good but nothing to brag about. The tires developed a whining tread noise shortly after I got the vehicle. Tread wear was even but pretty bad. At 16,000 miles, the treads are down to 4/32" on 2 tires and 5/32" on the other 2, and the tires have been rotated every 5,000 miles.

This vehicle is used for 4 to 5 ski trips to Mammoth Mountain every season and the snow and ice traction of these tires is absolutely awful. Last December my driveway had a light coat of packed snow on it and my minivan slid down the driveway with the ABS going off madly and the car sliding into the street like a sled. These tires are rated M+S but in the real world they are among the worst all season tires I've ever seen when it comes to snow and ice traction.

Vehicle: 2015 Toyota Sienna AWD Limited
Miles Driven on Tires: 16,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: SAN DIEGO, CA
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

July 20, 2011
2 out of 5 Star Rating
2 out of 5

...Also, the traction in the winter is terrible. Need to also invest in some winter RF tires to keep the family save.

We just passed 20,000 miles and get to replace the full set on our 2011 Sienna. No warranty and all the dealer can say is sorry...hearing lots of complaints on these run flat tires. Also, no options other than the Bridgestone Dueler, so will give that one a try. Completely unhappy with the tire and can't believe Toyota continues to use it. Also, the traction in the winter is terrible. Need to also invest in some winter RF tires to keep the family save.

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota Sienna AWD XLE
Miles Driven on Tires: 20,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Broomfield, CO
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

April 11, 2015
2.4 out of 5 Star Rating
2.4 out of 5

...Absolutely hate them! ... poor winter traction.

Original equipment tires. Absolutely hate them! Noisy, harsh ride, poor winter traction.

Vehicle: 2014 Mercedes-Benz E350 4MATIC Sedan
Miles Driven on Tires: 9,500
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: ROWLEY, MA
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

76 reviews mention "Ride Quality"

  • 34 positive
  • 42 negative

Mixed comfort ratings with many scoring 0-6. Frequent complaints of harsh ride, poor noise isolation, and uncomfortable feel. Even higher scores (7-10) note some road noise.

August 08, 2012
2 out of 5 Star Rating
2 out of 5

...The ride quality is horrible and you can feel every single bump in the road. Very stiff ride and noisy to boot. Compared to the Michelin Energy Tires we replaced them with they ride like Rocks...

We got these on our new 2011 Sienna AWD. We had to replace ALL FOUR of these tires today. They lasted 12,000 Miles. We have also had two flats in the last two months with these tires and the second one could not be patched. The ride quality is horrible and you can feel every single bump in the road. Very stiff ride and noisy to boot. Compared to the Michelin "Energy" Tires we replaced them with they ride like Rocks.

All in all, I'd say these new "run flats" will probably not be around in a few years. Both the Tire Shop (who couldn't find one anywhere) and the Dealer all say they are notorious for getting poor mileage and for getting ruined if you actually DO drive on them when they are flat. They are also very hard to find. Even good old Tire Rack didn't have them in stock today. In the end, we decided to just get a good set of Michelin "Energy" Tires and carry a can of "Fix a Flat" in the car. The Run Flats are a disaster. I suggest you wear out all four (which won't take long) and replace them all with another brand.

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota Sienna AWD Limited
Miles Driven on Tires: 12,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Cupertino, CA
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

February 27, 2014
(Verified Purchase)
N/A out of 5 Star Rating
Not Yet Rated

Horrible uncomfortable noisy I would need more adjectives thn the english language has to describe these poor performing fast wearing tires...

Horrible uncomfortable noisy I would need more adjectives thn the english language has to describe these poor performing fast wearing tires.they came on my new minivan that I transport my children in and after 15k miles I questioned toyota about the treadwear technician stated it was normal.Well I am now shopping for new tires at 30k because im not sure they will pass inspection im also opting to buy a 5th tire because my vehicle came without a spare

Vehicle: 2012 Toyota Sienna AWD Limited
Miles Driven on Tires: 32,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly Highway
Location: JOHNSONVILLE, NY
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

May 31, 2023
(Verified Purchase)
2.2 out of 5 Star Rating
2.2 out of 5

...Very loud and you feel every bump on the highway...

Not sure what toyota was thinking when they chose these as the oem tires. Very loud a d you feel every bump on the highway. Fronts on the first set wore through to the cords in less than 15k miles. Second set started to have two go bad at around 15k again. Only stuck with them, foolishly, the second go round because two of the 4 showed very little wear. Now all four show significant cupping. These get rotated every winter when we change them out for our snow tires. Switching to non-runflats and a different brand now.

Vehicle: 2017 Toyota Sienna AWD XLE
Miles Driven on Tires: 12,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: HUDSON, OH
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

68 reviews mention "Treadwear"

  • 12 positive
  • 56 negative

Treadwear ratings are disappointing, with many scores between 0-5 and some 6s indicating premature wear and dissatisfaction. While a few rate 8-10, frequent mentions of rapid tread loss and needing early replacement highlight significant concerns. Customers report excessive wear and being unimpressed with mileage, often reaching wear bars sooner than expected.

April 14, 2014
2 out of 5 Star Rating
2 out of 5

I checked the tires and the radials are showing at 32K miles. I can't believe they are so worn after only 32K miles...

I would only purchase these tires again, because I can't find any other. My wife primarily drives my minivan and she told me the other day that she thinks she needs new tires. I checked the tires and the radials are showing at 32K miles. I can't believe they are so worn after only 32K miles. Piece of garbage, but what is my alternative? I can't take my chance on getting a flat tire. NEVER again will I buy a vehicle with no room for a spare. THANKS TOYOTA!

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota AWD LE
Miles Driven on Tires: 32,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: OAK RIDGE, NJ
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

December 14, 2016
(Verified Purchase)
2.4 out of 5 Star Rating
2.4 out of 5

...We have 28k miles and have stayed on top of regular maintenance. They already need to be replaced and one is showing wire. At roughly $1000 to replace this is ridiculous!...

Awful tires! Never buying again! They came factory on our vehicle. We have 28k miles and have stayed on top of regular maintenance. They already need to be replaced and one is showing wire. At roughly $1000 to replace this is ridiculous! I shouldn't need to buy tires every 25k miles. I contacted Bridgestone and it's been 3 days with no response from them. Poor product and bad customer service.

Vehicle: 2015 Toyota Sienna AWD Limited
Miles Driven on Tires: 28,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

August 07, 2015
3.2 out of 5 Star Rating
3.2 out of 5

...I had inside tire wear with secondary rubber showing and very little tread left... The original Turanzas lasted almost two years... I am greatly disappointed in the wear and replacement costs.

Well shoot. I am just a mom with a minivan. I took my van in for it's 30,000 mi maintenance. Toyota tells me my tires are shot and they quoted me $1111 to replace. I had inside tire wear with secondary rubber showing and very little tread left. My options are severely limited for replacements if I stick with run flats. I can either get another set of the Turanzas or another Bridgestone tire called the Dueler H/L 400. Since my Sienna does not have a spare, and it seems ridiculous to ride around with a full sized spare or some fix-a -flat, I guess I am stuck ----ing it up and getting another set of run flats. The original Turanzas lasted almost two years. If I do the math, looks like I need to start socking away $40 a month in a savings account for next time. To add insult to injury, within the first few months of driving this vehicle I got a puncture in the sidewall that couldn't be repaired an I was stuck paying $230 for one replacement. OUCH!! I also got another puncture after that but it was repaired just fine. Toyota really needs to get it together. Don't they know I have to pay for daycare too? Hindsight, If I knew that the tires on this thing last half as as long and cost twice as much, I probably would not have got the Sienna (or any vehicle without a spare). As far as performance goes, I live in Salt Lake City and rallied these tires through the snow on highways and up the canyon roads. Rarely did I lose traction. They handled well in snow and rain and were not that loud when they had good tread for that measly year and a half. I am greatly disappointed in the wear and replacement costs.

Vehicle: 2013 Toyota Sienna AWD LE
Miles Driven on Tires: 29,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly Highway
Location: COTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

Consumer Reviews

SERVICE WITH A SMILE

Need help choosing the right products for your vehicle? Our US-based team of highly trained experts has the knowledge and passion to help. Just pick up the phone and give us a ring. Or let's chat via email. We love solving problems and lending a hand (or an ear).

Contact Us
Three smiling Tire Rack employees