Wheel not included

  • Dunlop SP Sport 5000 M
  • Dunlop SP Sport 5000 M

Does this tire fit your vehicle?

Tires are designed specifically for different vehicles and wheel sizes. Tell us about your vehicle or the specific size you want so we can help find the right tires for you.

The SP Sport 5000M is Dunlop's Ultra High Performance All-Season radial developed for Original Equipment use on coupes, performance sedans and sporty crossover vehicles. The SP Sport 5000M is designed to provide ultra high performance and all-season versatility by blending traction on dry, wet and wintry roads, including in occasional light snow.

The SP Sport 5000M molds a high performance all-season tread compound into a symmetric tread design consisting of a continuous center rib flanked by independent intermediate and shoulder blocks that blend traction, treadwear and rolling resistance to meet a wide range of driving conditions. Full-face, engineered crosscut sipes provide more biting edges for slush and snow traction. The tires' internal structures include twin steel belts reinforced by Dunlop's Jointless Band (JLB) technology that uses spirally wound nylon to provide high-speed durability while it reduces weight and helps provide more uniform ride quality.

Ratings Charts & Reviews Dunlop SP Sport 5000 M

Tire Category: Ultra High Performance All-Season

Consumer Surveys

 
Best in Category
Miles Reported
Recommended
Treadwear
Dunlop SP Sport 5000 M
Fair
63%
10M
3.3 - Poor
5.7 - Fair
5.5 Hydroplaning Resistance
6.0 Wet Traction
7.6 - Good
7.4 Corner Stability
7.8 Dry Traction
7.5 Steering Response
3.0 - Poor
3.9 Light Snow Traction
2.5 Deep Snow Traction
2.6 Ice Traction
6.4 - Fair
6.5 Ride Quality
6.3 Noise
5.2 - Fair

Customers Say

Feedback demonstrates the Dunlop SP Sport 5000 M delivers strong dry traction (scores 8-10) with responsive handling, aligning with its Ultra High Performance All-Season intent. Wet performance raises concerns, with inconsistent grip and hydroplaning resistance (scores 2-8), while winter traction struggles in snow/ice (scores 0-5). Ride comfort earns praise for smoothness (scores 6-9), though some note road noise. Treadwear receives mixed feedback, with multiple reports of rapid wear (scores 1-7). While excelling in dry conditions and comfort, drivers should consider its limitations in wet weather and winter use.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more

Customers Like:
Customers Dislike:

398 customers mention "Dry Traction"

  • 319 positive
  • 79 negative

Most customers rate dry traction highly, with scores between 8-10 highlighting responsive handling and reliable grip. Some lower ratings exist, but overall performance aligns well with Ultra High Performance All-Season expectations.

May 18, 2003

3.7 out of 5 Star Rating
3.7 out of 5

...When the weathers dry, theyre hard to beat. The car tracks as if its on rails, the tire acts predictably, steering feel is light but well-coupled to the driver.

The SP Sport 5000M in size 195/50-16 are OEM on my 2002 Mazda Protege 5. When the weathers dry, theyre hard to beat. The car tracks as if its on rails, the tire acts predictably, steering feel is light but well-coupled to the driver. Get in wet weather conditions however, and it feels like you have no control at all. These tires have the worst wet weather traction and are the most susceptible to hydroplaning of any tires Ive owned. Granted, I am used to "summer" tires, but I expected more for tires that appear to be so well regarded in surveys. Ive used Dunlop tires for 12 years (D40/M2 and SP Sport 8000) and loved them, but these all-season tires are actually hazardous to my health. The Protege 5 will torque steer and point itself in any direction other than straight ahead when it breaks grip on any front tire, so the SP Sport 5000M is NOT recommended for this particular platform.

Vehicle: 2002 Mazda Protege 5
Miles Driven on Tires: 11,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: roanoke, va
Driving Style: Spirited
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

September 05, 2004

3.7 out of 5 Star Rating
3.7 out of 5

...but is excellent in dry...

i drive my car from CA to TX, it rain so bad from EL PASO to HOUSTON on I-10, 10 hr drive, rain alomost 7.5 hr, it feel like driving in hell..i was so scare i will die in nowhere, i cant believe that tire is SSSOOOO bad in rain, i feel i was sking at the time, u can picture i was so helpless at the time...this tire is so ---- in rain....but is excellent in dry ....so, u make the call

Vehicle: 2003 Mazda Protege 5
Miles Driven on Tires: 12,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: houston, tx
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

July 26, 2003

3.2 out of 5 Star Rating
3.2 out of 5

...a little edgy but extremely responsive and grippy. Theres just not enough power to make them slip.

Dry: a little edgy (could also be the car) but extremely responsive and grippy. Theres just not enough power to make them slip. Do have a slight tendency to follow grooves in the pavement. Wet: they work, but poorly. Hydroplane easily, feel squishy, slide a lot. Key feature: on dry pavement its very hard to get into the ABS - they grip so much you have to back off to keep the person behind from hitting you; in the wet the ABS gets used a LOT. Wear seems to be minor so far, but I dont drive hard and after all there are only 5K miles on the car. Ride is kind of hard, but thats the cars style anyway. Noise OK - quieter than the Dunlop A2s on the Camry. I do hope there are decent alternatives when replacement time comes - especially something that works better in the wet.

Vehicle: 2003 Mazda Protege 5
Miles Driven on Tires: 5,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Folsom, CA
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

400 customers mention "Ride Quality"

  • 222 positive
  • 178 negative

Most customers rate comfort between 7-8, with many scoring 9-10. Positive feedback highlights smooth ride quality and effective noise reduction, aligning well with all-season expectations for a refined driving experience.

December 13, 2011

3.7 out of 5 Star Rating
3.7 out of 5

...I really liked these tires for their handling capabilities, corning responsiveness, ride comfort, and noise level...

These are the OEM tires that came with my vehicle. I really liked these tires for their handling capabilities, corning responsiveness, ride comfort, and noise level. But they wore out EXTREMLY quickly (20K miles). Their cheap and soft and just don't have the endurance I would have expected.

But if you're looking for a relatively quiet tire, that handles and grips really well (in corners, I had a few times where they would lose traction from a start [in a manual transmission vehicle], and under hard excelleration even in 2nd gear) and is comfortable, and do not care about longevity, this is a great tire.

But if you're looking for longevity, this is not what you want.

I won't be purchasing this tire again.

Vehicle: 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS
Miles Driven on Tires: 21,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Ontario, CA
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

April 11, 2007

4.5 out of 5 Star Rating
4.5 out of 5

...I really liked the Dunlops, but (safe) tread wear is around 20-25K miles...

This is my third set of these tires. Ill probably keep the ML until the 09 BMW X-3 comes out.

My next set of tires will probably be the Conti CrossContact LX due to the Superior noise/comfort

levels. Otherwise, if I lived up North Id buy the Goodyear Fortera Triple Tred or the Bridgestone Dueler

H/L Alenza. I really liked the Dunlops, but (safe) tread wear is around 20-25K miles. BTW- mine are

M&S for those trips through Florida mud after storms and those early Northern snow storms when

visiting friends and relatives.

Vehicle: 2001 Mercedes-Benz ML320
Miles Driven on Tires: 20,000
Driving Conditions: All On Road
Location: Naples, FL
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

390 customers mention "Wet Traction"

  • 165 positive
  • 225 negative

Many customers report disappointing wet traction with scores between 0-6, noting slippery handling and hydroplaning concerns. While some rate it 7-8, frequent low ratings highlight mediocre wet performance for an all-season tire.

August 20, 2004

3.5 out of 5 Star Rating
3.5 out of 5

Overnight, at 11,000 miles, these tires went from adequate to useless in the rain, for stopping, starting, hydroplane resistance; I am now very careful when I corner...

Overnight, at 11,000 miles, these tires went from adequate to useless in the rain, for stopping, starting, hydroplane resistance; I am now very careful when I corner. This low-powered car has an automatic transmission, so I cant really drive the car hard. Tread depth is 7/32 at the front, and 8/32 at the back, although the tires were rotated 5,000 miles ago. These tires are still fantastic in the dry, but its not always dry, and Ive read enough about them to know not to try them in the snow. Steering response with 195/50-16 stock size is great, and nobody complains about the stiff ride, which is as much to do with the suspension, as the tires.

Vehicle: 2003 Mazda Tribute LX
Miles Driven on Tires: 12,500
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Richmond Hill, ON
Driving Style: Easy Going
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

November 05, 2004

2.3 out of 5 Star Rating
2.3 out of 5

...They had to use their minivan to push my car into their slopped driveway because the Dunlops would not get any traction to pull the car into their slopped driveway, there wasnt any snow or anything just on wet driveway! And when this happened I had only 5500 miles on the car and tires!!!...

These Dunlops were the factory equipped tires and they were horrible. I had to replace all four tires at 19k miles due to tread wear(I have always gotten atleast 30k out of a set of tires). I replaced them with a set of BFGoodrich G force sport tires(205/50/ZR16) and am extremely pleased with my BFGs, and have nearly 10k on the BFGs with no noticable tread wear! I bought this vehcile new on 1-9-04 and in 3-04 took the car to Spokane, WA to visit friends. I happened to get there while it was raining. They had to use their minivan to push my car into their slopped driveway because the Dunlops would not get any traction to pull the car into their slopped driveway, there wasnt any snow or anything just a wet driveway! And when this happened I had only 5500 miles on the car and tires!!! After the horrible experience with these Dunlops I will never recommend a Dunlop tire to anyone I know. I do alot of driving (my Pr5 is only 11 months old and I have over 29k on the car) and have never had a set of tires that were so crappy in my life. I say dont buy these tires, you wont be happy with them.

Vehicle: 2003 Mazda Protege 5
Miles Driven on Tires: 19,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Driving Style: Spirited
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

April 20, 2003

2.8 out of 5 Star Rating
2.8 out of 5

...Wet traction leaves much to desire...

OEM tires on my Protege5. Overall not a bad tire. Did much better in the snow than I expected. Wet traction leaves much to desire, but when its dry the tires are very predictable and stable.



www.protege5.com





Vehicle: 2002 Mazda Protege 5
Miles Driven on Tires: 16,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly Highway
Location: Berea, KY
Driving Style: Spirited
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

300 customers mention "Winter Traction"

  • 50 positive
  • 250 negative

Winter traction ratings reveal concerning performance, with many scores between 0-5 in snow, ice, and deep snow. Despite being an all-season tire, customers report slippery conditions, loss of traction, and being stuck, indicating unacceptable winter capability.

October 30, 2009 (Verified Purchase)

1.9 out of 5 Star Rating
1.9 out of 5

...There is absolutely no traction in any amount of snow. There is no traction at all when climbing any grade in snow, they break loose very quickly even with the lightest of acceleration. My first time driving in light snow left me shaking with fear...

These tires came stock on my Lancer GTS. There is absolutely no traction in any amount of snow. There is no traction at all when climbing any grade in snow, they break loose very quickly even with the lightest of acceleration. My first time driving in light snow left me shaking with fear. There is not much traction when accelerating from a standstill in rain either. These are great summer tires. Only 18K miles & i have less than 50% tread left. There the worse tires I ever had. I just bought another Lancer GTS(2010) sadly it came with the same tires.

Vehicle: 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS
Miles Driven on Tires: 18,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Garden City Park, NY
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

December 20, 2009

2.3 out of 5 Star Rating
2.3 out of 5

...1 inch of snow have to turn left to go foward in snow lost control in snow at 3MPH and hit a curb and scatched my rim Then had to drive 30 miles home took me 4 hr and was in fear of my life the whole time

Very bad tires I will be on the phone with the car company 1 inch of snow have to turn left to go foward in snow lost control in snow at 3MPH and hit a curb and scatched my rim Then had to drive 30 miles home took me 4 hr and was in fear of my life the whole time

Vehicle: 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer
Miles Driven on Tires: 3,300
Driving Conditions: Mostly Highway
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

January 31, 2010

2.6 out of 5 Star Rating
2.6 out of 5

...I did not anticipate significant winter issues with the rear-wheel drive Genesis, but did not foresee the pitiful snow/ice performance of the Dunlops. They provide virtually zero traction...and should not be used in winter conditions.

Simply adding my observations to those of the previous two Genesis owners. This was the 18-inch OEM tire bundled with my upgrade package. I did not anticipate significant winter issues with the rear-wheel drive Genesis, but did not foresee the pitiful snow/ice performance of the Dunlops. They provide virtually zero traction...and should not be used in winter conditions.

Vehicle: 2009 Hyundai Genesis Sedan 3.8
Miles Driven on Tires: 5,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Omaha, NE
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

373 customers mention "Treadwear"

  • 133 positive
  • 240 negative

Treadwear ratings reveal widespread dissatisfaction, with many scores between 0-5. Customers report rapid wear, premature replacement, and tread life falling far short of expectations for an Ultra High Performance All-Season tire.

May 31, 2007

1.6 out of 5 Star Rating
1.6 out of 5

Tread wear disappointing, also I had a steel belt break. Vehicle driven by senior only and mostly alone or one passenger...

Tread wear disappointing, also I had a steel belt break. Vehicle driven by senior only and mostly alone or one passenger. My van has neve seen snow or ice, and is stored indoors every day.

Vehicle: 2000 Mazda MPV LX
Miles Driven on Tires: 30,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly City
Location: Dartmouth, NS
Driving Style: Easy Going
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

May 26, 2008

1.5 out of 5 Star Rating
1.5 out of 5

these tires came stock on my gts, and did not expect to have to replace them until at least 20000 miles, now they are down to 3-32nds of tread and slipping in dry conditions...

these tires came stock on my gts, and did not expect to have to replace them until at least 20000 miles, now they are down to 3-32nds of tread and slipping in dry conditions

one rotation and i don't burnout on my tires, cause i know how expensive they are. i don't recommend these tires to anyone with this vehicle. I am very displeased and to say the least shocked, how a i4 2.0 could possibly spin these tires, when the torque band is 2-6 rpm when the mivec kicks in but thats 150 pounds of fury wow!!

Vehicle: 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS
Miles Driven on Tires: 10,166
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: schaumburg, il
Driving Style: Spirited
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

December 24, 2008

2.4 out of 5 Star Rating
2.4 out of 5

...Tread wear is quick.

I did not buy these tires, sadly they came with the car. I've been driving for 6 years. These are the first "All Season" tires that I hydroplaned in while driving. The tires do not respond well on wet/icy/snowy roads. Honestly I expected better for "All Season" tires. Calling these tires "All Season" is a stretch! Buy at your own risk. Tread wear is quick.

Vehicle: 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS
Miles Driven on Tires: 22,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

Consumer Reviews

SERVICE WITH A SMILE

Need help choosing the right products for your vehicle? Our US-based team of highly trained experts has the knowledge and passion to help. Just pick up the phone and give us a ring. Or let's chat via email. We love solving problems and lending a hand (or an ear).

Contact Us
Three smiling Tire Rack employees