Wheel not included

  • YokohamaGeolandar M/T G003
  • YokohamaGeolandar M/T G003
  • Tire Rack's Pledge to you
Tire Rack Test

Does this tire fit your vehicle?

Tires are designed specifically for different vehicles and wheel sizes. Tell us about your vehicle or the specific size you want so we can help find the right tires for you.

The Geolandar M/T G003 is Yokohama’s Off-Road Maximum Traction tire designed for the drivers of pickup trucks, full-size SUVs, Jeeps and dedicated off-road vehicles who want a tire with the traction and durability to travel far off the beaten path, but without the compromises in wet traction, noise and wear drivers of Off-Road Maximum Traction tires, frequently called mud tires, often experience.

tire callouts

The aggressive, off-road focused tread pattern of the Geolandar M/T G003 is molded from Yokohama’s Triple Polymer Blend compound. This high-density compound is cut- and chip-resistant, and helps deliver improved on-road handling and off-road traction. The high-void tread pattern features a block orientation and pitch variation specifically focused on reducing obtrusive noise during on-road driving, and the in-block siping combines with the Triple Polymer Blend compound to deliver confident wet traction.

Geolandar M/T G003 tires utilize Yokohama’s proprietary Geo-Shield Construction. Three polyester body plies (two on load range C tires) wrap around a strong, hexagonal bead to form the tire’s casing. Two high-strength steel belts support the tread and are reinforced by a full-width nylon cap for added durability. Specially-designed Sidewall Armor features over-the-shoulder tread blocks and upper sidewall protection lugs to resist punctures and seek out any available traction in deep, loose terrain.

While Off-Road Maximum Traction tires are branded with the M+S symbol and able to churn through deep snow, their typical oversize applications and the limited number of snow-biting sipes in their large lugs can challenge their on-road wintertime traction on packed snow and icy surfaces.

Tire Rack Test Results Yokohama Geolandar M/T G003

May 17, 2017

Tires Tested

Yokohama Geolandar M/T G003 (Off-Road Maximum Traction)

Vehicles Used

Jeep Wrangler Sport

Longer. Stronger. Shorter. Quieter. This is the mission statement of Yokohama’s new Geolandar M/T G003, with "Go Strong" as the battle cry.

Longer entails longer tread life, with a new, Triple Polymer Blend high-density tread compound and optimized contact patch combining for a claimed 8% longer tread life than the leading competitor’s Off-Road Maximum Traction tire. Stronger is handled by Yokohama’s Geo-Shield construction, three polyester casing plies, two high-strength steel belts and a full-width, nylon reinforcement cap ply designed to provide durability in the tread area along with puncture resistance. The Triple Polymer Blend compound is cut- and chip-resistant, and the upper sidewall lugs and over-the-shoulder tread blocks form Sidewall Armor to deflect debris that may potentially rupture the tire while traversing challenging terrain. Optimized sipes in the tread blocks and the advanced compound deliver 40-0 mph wet braking distances that are 51 feet Shorter than the leading competitor, according to Yokohama, and the tire’s block pattern and pitch variation are engineered for harmonics that result in a tire 2.3 dB Quieter than its predecessor.

To experience first-hand the performance of the Yokohama Geolandar M/T G003, select members of the Tire Rack test team traveled to Gateway, Colorado to participate in a launch event, complete with a scenic drive far off the beaten path and some hard laps around a dirt track in purpose-built, off-road race trucks.

Jeep Wrangler Sport Gateway is home to some of the most ruggedly beautiful landscape in the country, and the route planned by our hosts allowed the team to experience it firsthand. A quick jaunt over paved highway led the convoy of Jeep Wranglers to a dirt road that lazily wound its way along the base of one of the area’s many mesas. This packed, red dirt had a thin layer of loose soil on the surface, but the Geolandar M/T G003 tires never felt nervous or skittish, as can happen in those conditions. In short order, the route began a steep ascent, transitioning from a dirt road, to a grassy two-track, to nothing more than two deep ruts as it continued to climb. Adding to the variable terrain, it began to sleet about an hour into the drive, turning dirt to mud and reducing available traction on all surfaces. A portion of the drive traversed the aptly named "Rocky Road," which consisted of flat, smooth rocks, loose stone, jagged, half-buried boulders, ruts and craters, with steep and abrupt elevation changes throughout. While attempting to pick the right line to navigate through this veritable minefield, the tires’ capability was rarely a concern. One particularly steep incline over the face of a slick, wet rock required two attempts and a considerable amount of throttle, but otherwise the Geolandar M/T G003 never faltered. The same can be said for the steep descent back down the mesa, where, despite the grade being slick with mud, the convoy of Jeeps was able to make safe and controlled progress to lower elevations.

Gateway, Colorado Mesas Though originally scheduled as a dirt track drive, steady rain throughout the morning meant the afternoon experience would be a serious test of the new tires’ mud traction. The 2.2-mile track created for the event consisted of tight hairpins turns and esses, sweeping turns, elevation changes, a long front straight and six jumps. The off-road racing trucks used as test vehicles were rear-engine, tube-frame chassis with long-travel suspension and a rudimentary, fiberglass body shell. At that point, the track surface ranged from tightly packed dirt with the consistency of wet sand in most of the straighter sections of the course, to deep, loose loamy soil that managed to stay relatively dry due to the constant churning from passing vehicles’ tires, to a traction-reducing thick and slimy muck on top of hard pack that felt comparable to driving on ice. The variable conditions, combined with a lack of familiarity with the dynamics of the vehicle and constant barrage of mud being thrown through the glassless front window meant the experience proved challenging for both the tires and the drivers. A healthy amount of trail braking through turns was mandatory to keep weight over the front end and provide the tires with the bite needed to change trajectory. Once rotated, the Geolandar M/T G003 was able to dig into the terrain and put the power down to accelerate away from turns. Yokohama Geolander M/T G003Braking in all but the worst conditions was confidence-inspiring once the driver had a feel for the rate of deceleration on various surfaces, keeping the vehicle under control and preventing excessive understeer through turns. And we can confirm that, combined with the long-travel suspension of the test trucks, the Geolandar M/T G003 provides a luxuriously soft return to terra firma after catching air over the numerous jumps on track.

In all, the Yokohama Geolandar M/T G003 allowed a group of essentially stock Jeep Wrangler Sport models access to remote locales that would have been unattainable for most vehicles. It conquered rocks of all shapes and sizes, deep ruts, dirt roads, wet grass and an off-road course that would have left many tires punctured, shredded or hopelessly spinning in search of traction.

Read Full Report

Ratings Charts & Reviews Yokohama Geolandar M/T G003

Tire Category: Off-Road Maximum Traction

Consumer Surveys

 
Best in Category
Miles Reported
Recommended
Treadwear
Yokohama Geolandar M/T G003
Excellent
100%
898K
9.2 - Excellent
9.5 - Excellent
9.6 Dirt Traction
9.2 Sand Traction
9.6 Mud Traction
9.5 Rock Traction
8.8 - Excellent
8.8 Hydroplaning Resistance
8.7 Wet Traction
9.2 - Excellent
9.1 Corner Stability
9.5 Dry Traction
9.1 Steering Response
8.6 - Excellent
9.2 Light Snow Traction
9.1 Deep Snow Traction
7.6 Ice Traction
8.2 - Good
8.5 Ride Quality
7.9 Noise
8.5 - Good

Hankook Kinergy GT Reviews

Feedback consistently shows the Hankook Kinergy GT delivers strong dry traction (scores 8-10) with responsive handling, meeting expectations for a Grand Touring All-Season tire. However, comfort receives mixed feedback, with some noting excessive road noise and harshness. Treadwear scores (often 0-5) raise concerns about longevity, a notable drawback for an all-season tire. Winter traction shows inconsistency, particularly on ice and in deep snow, with scores ranging widely (0-8). Wet traction is generally adequate (scores 5-8), though some report reduced hydroplaning resistance. While dry performance shines, buyers prioritizing comfort or winter capability may find limitations.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more

Customers Like:

Customers Dislike:

361 reviews mention "Dry Traction"

  • 255 positive
  • 106 negative

Most customers rate dry traction highly, with scores primarily 7-10. The Hankook Kinergy GT delivers responsive handling and reliable grip in dry conditions, excelling as a Grand Touring All-Season tire for confident everyday driving.

June 21, 2025
3.8 out of 5 Star Rating
3.8 out of 5

...Wet and dry traction have been very good. Never experienced any hydroplaning.

I don't understand all of the poor reviews for this tire. They are OE on my 2023 Trailblazer and I haven't experienced any problems. After 28000 miles they show very little tread wear and I have no doubt they'll last another 28000 miles easy. They ride very smooth, but could be a little quieter. Wet and dry traction have been very good. Never experienced any hydroplaning.

Vehicle: 2023 Chevrolet Trailblazer AWD 225/55-18
Miles Driven on Tires: 28,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: NEW BERN, NC
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

March 10, 2026
(Verified Purchase)
3.2 out of 5 Star Rating
3.2 out of 5

...Dry and wet conditions traction is pretty good...

These tires were the OEM on my 2024 Chevrolet Malibu LT.

Pros- The ride is pretty good, Dry and wet conditions traction is pretty good. Steering response.

Cons- Moderately noisy most of the time, and very noisy on certain surfaces. Terrible performance on ice or hard packed snow. Mpg seems to drop off excessively in colder sub zero temperatures. Tread depth is not as deep brand new. Seem to be wearing quickly. 13k miles and approx 2/32" already worn. (8.5/32" new, so only 6.5/32" available to wear).

Bottom line- I would not install these again unless they were really really cheap.

Vehicle: 2024 Chevrolet Malibu 225/55-17
Miles Driven on Tires: 13,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: FERGUS FALLS, MN
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

May 28, 2024
2.2 out of 5 Star Rating
2.2 out of 5

...Dry traction is adequate and cornering stability is not bad...

Nice comfortable ride and low road noise. But that's where the positives end. Treacherous on wet roads or any precipitation. Dry traction is adequate and cornering stability is not bad. I understand why Tesla would want an internal foam-lined tire to offset the inherent road noise in the cabin of the pre-2024 Model 3. But the trade off in this case was not worth it by any means. I would stay away from this tire if you're purchasing replacements. Even after only 5K on these I will likely replace with something safer.

Vehicle: 2023 Tesla Model 3 AWD 235/45-18 SL (Standard Load)
Miles Driven on Tires: 4,600
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: SHORELINE, WA
Driving Style: Average

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

346 reviews mention "Wet Traction"

  • 161 positive
  • 185 negative

Wet traction scores show concerning inconsistency, with many ratings between 0-6. Customers report a slippery feel, tendency to hydroplane, and mediocre wet performance for this all-season tire, indicating significant room for improvement.

May 06, 2025
(Verified Purchase)
1.1 out of 5 Star Rating
1.1 out of 5

...Wet traction is horrible and don't even get me started with snow...

These came with my Camry and OMG why Toyota, just why? These are by far the worst tires I have ever driven on. When I got my Camry I thought it was a little rough. Bumps and potholes seemed to be alot more harsh then I ever thought a Camry should be. I even thought it might have been a suspension issue, it wasnt. It was the tires. The people who say they are quiet must be confusing tire noise for engine noise. These are insanely loud. Wet traction is horrible and don't even get me started with snow. If somebody told me these were some cheap no name Chinese knock offs, I would believe them. Shame on Toyota for ever using these as stock on any vehicle. Get the Continental TrueContact Tour 54, you'll thank me for it.

Vehicle: 2022 Toyota Camry 4cyl SE
Miles Driven on Tires: 20,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: STURBRIDGE, MA
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

232 reviews mention "Winter Traction"

  • 66 positive
  • 166 negative

Winter traction ratings show concerning scores, with many 0-5s for ice and deep snow. Customers report slippery conditions, getting stuck, and lack of winter traction despite its all-season intent.

January 19, 2026
(Verified Purchase)
2 out of 5 Star Rating
2 out of 5

...Now this winter has been a nightmare even with my cautious driving. We haven't even gotten that deep of snow yet and even in just an inch or two, the traction control light comes on frequently and I almost didn't make it up a very slight hill...

These came with the vehicle. The car was my grandmother's in Florida and she barely drove it, gifted it to me when she decided to go down to 1 car. I moved it up to Massachusetts where I didn't notice really any problems with it over the summer and fall, but I am a super cautious driver and always drive slow in the rain as I'm used to older used cars. Now this winter has been a nightmare even with my cautious driving. We haven't even gotten that deep of snow yet and even in just an inch or two, the traction control light comes on frequently and I almost didn't make it up a very slight hill. I'm getting them replaced immediately before we get some bigger snowstorms. The tread is also under 2/32 already. The roads up here are bad, but I haven't even hit 40,000 miles. Tires have been rotated frequently enough, I think it's just what other reviewers are saying, these do not last as they're supposed to. I'm curious to what I'll notice with my new tires (Pirelli Scorpions) in the dry and wet conditions as they're rated so much higher. Other reviewers spoke unfavorably but I'm not too experienced or well-versed in the world of cars, so I probably didn't notice and I'm looking forward to the improvement. Would not recommend these, especially if you drive in any amount of snow.

Vehicle: 2018 Honda CR-V AWD Touring
Miles Driven on Tires: 31,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: MEDFORD, MA
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

March 10, 2026
(Verified Purchase)
3.2 out of 5 Star Rating
3.2 out of 5

...Terrible performance on ice or hard packed snow. Mpg seems to drop off excessively in colder sub zero temperatures...

These tires were the OEM on my 2024 Chevrolet Malibu LT.

Pros- The ride is pretty good, Dry and wet conditions traction is pretty good. Steering response.

Cons- Moderately noisy most of the time, and very noisy on certain surfaces. Terrible performance on ice or hard packed snow. Mpg seems to drop off excessively in colder sub zero temperatures. Tread depth is not as deep brand new. Seem to be wearing quickly. 13k miles and approx 2/32" already worn. (8.5/32" new, so only 6.5/32" available to wear).

Bottom line- I would not install these again unless they were really really cheap.

Vehicle: 2024 Chevrolet Malibu 225/55-17
Miles Driven on Tires: 13,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: FERGUS FALLS, MN
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

358 reviews mention "Ride Quality"

  • 196 positive
  • 162 negative

While some rate comfort highly with 9s-10s, numerous scores between 0-6 highlight harsh ride, unbearable noise, and dissatisfaction. Many report low comfort and poor ride quality, conflicting with Grand Touring expectations.

February 28, 2026
1.7 out of 5 Star Rating
1.7 out of 5

...road noise very disappointing

with proper balance, rotation did not come close to manufacturer's limited tread life, road noise very disappointing

Vehicle: 2024 Nissan Altima FWD SL
Miles Driven on Tires: 40,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly City
Location: KERNERSVILLE, NC
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

March 10, 2026
(Verified Purchase)
3.2 out of 5 Star Rating
3.2 out of 5

...The ride is pretty good...

These tires were the OEM on my 2024 Chevrolet Malibu LT.

Pros- The ride is pretty good, Dry and wet conditions traction is pretty good. Steering response.

Cons- Moderately noisy most of the time, and very noisy on certain surfaces. Terrible performance on ice or hard packed snow. Mpg seems to drop off excessively in colder sub zero temperatures. Tread depth is not as deep brand new. Seem to be wearing quickly. 13k miles and approx 2/32" already worn. (8.5/32" new, so only 6.5/32" available to wear).

Bottom line- I would not install these again unless they were really really cheap.

Vehicle: 2024 Chevrolet Malibu 225/55-17
Miles Driven on Tires: 13,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: FERGUS FALLS, MN
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

319 reviews mention "Treadwear"

  • 123 positive
  • 196 negative

Treadwear ratings reveal significant dissatisfaction, with many scores between 0-5 citing premature wear, rapid tread loss, and needing replacement early. While some rate 7-10, frequent low scores highlight poor longevity for a Grand Touring tire, with customers disappointed in mileage and excessive wear.

January 31, 2026
3.3 out of 5 Star Rating
3.3 out of 5

...I don't beat up the tires when I drive, stay on top of inflations, rotated at 5,000 and 10,000 miles...and replaced them at 15,000 miles due to treadwear. Worst treadwear I've ever had in 40+ years and over a million miles driven...

These Hankook Kinergy tires were the OEM tires for my Accord Hybrid. I don't beat up the tires when I drive, stay on top of inflations, rotated at 5,000 and 10,000 miles...and replaced them at 15,000 miles due to treadwear. Worst treadwear I've ever had in 40+ years and over a million miles driven. No way would I recommend these.

Vehicle: 2024 Honda Accord Hybrid EX-L
Miles Driven on Tires: 15,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly City
Location: LAKE FOREST, CA
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

January 19, 2026
(Verified Purchase)
2 out of 5 Star Rating
2 out of 5

...The tread is also under 2/32 already. The roads up here are bad, but I haven't even hit 40,000 miles. Tires have been rotated frequently enough, I think it's just what other reviewers are saying, these do not last as they're supposed to...

These came with the vehicle. The car was my grandmother's in Florida and she barely drove it, gifted it to me when she decided to go down to 1 car. I moved it up to Massachusetts where I didn't notice really any problems with it over the summer and fall, but I am a super cautious driver and always drive slow in the rain as I'm used to older used cars. Now this winter has been a nightmare even with my cautious driving. We haven't even gotten that deep of snow yet and even in just an inch or two, the traction control light comes on frequently and I almost didn't make it up a very slight hill. I'm getting them replaced immediately before we get some bigger snowstorms. The tread is also under 2/32 already. The roads up here are bad, but I haven't even hit 40,000 miles. Tires have been rotated frequently enough, I think it's just what other reviewers are saying, these do not last as they're supposed to. I'm curious to what I'll notice with my new tires (Pirelli Scorpions) in the dry and wet conditions as they're rated so much higher. Other reviewers spoke unfavorably but I'm not too experienced or well-versed in the world of cars, so I probably didn't notice and I'm looking forward to the improvement. Would not recommend these, especially if you drive in any amount of snow.

Vehicle: 2018 Honda CR-V AWD Touring
Miles Driven on Tires: 31,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: MEDFORD, MA
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

March 10, 2026
(Verified Purchase)
3.2 out of 5 Star Rating
3.2 out of 5

...Tread depth is not as deep brand new. Seem to be wearing quickly. 13k miles and approx 2/32" already worn. ( 8.5/32" new, so only 6.5/32" available to wear)...

These tires were the OEM on my 2024 Chevrolet Malibu LT.

Pros- The ride is pretty good, Dry and wet conditions traction is pretty good. Steering response.

Cons- Moderately noisy most of the time, and very noisy on certain surfaces. Terrible performance on ice or hard packed snow. Mpg seems to drop off excessively in colder sub zero temperatures. Tread depth is not as deep brand new. Seem to be wearing quickly. 13k miles and approx 2/32" already worn. (8.5/32" new, so only 6.5/32" available to wear).

Bottom line- I would not install these again unless they were really really cheap.

Vehicle: 2024 Chevrolet Malibu 225/55-17
Miles Driven on Tires: 13,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: FERGUS FALLS, MN
Driving Style: Easy Going

Was this review helpful?

Yes No

You found this review helpful.

You did not find this review helpful.

Updating...

This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

Consumer Reviews

SERVICE WITH A SMILE

Need help choosing the right products for your vehicle? Our US-based team of highly trained experts has the knowledge and passion to help. Just pick up the phone and give us a ring. Or let's chat via email. We love solving problems and lending a hand (or an ear).

Contact Us
Three smiling Tire Rack employees