Wheel not included

  • Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT
  • Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT

Does this tire fit your vehicle?

Tires are designed specifically for different vehicles and wheel sizes. Tell us about your vehicle or the specific size you want so we can help find the right tires for you.

Special Offers
One of these offers may be applied.

The Turanza EL400-02 RFT is Bridgestone's Standard Touring All-Season self-supporting run-flat tire developed as Original Equipment (O.E.) for Lexus IS250C and IS350C models, as well as all-wheel drive Toyota Sienna* minivans as of the 2011 model year. The Turanza EL400-02 RFT is designed to combine temporary extended mobility (for a distance of at least 50 miles at up to 50 mph even after a puncture has allowed complete air pressure loss) with dry, wet and wintertime traction, even in light snow.

Turanza EL400-02 RFT tires feature an all-season rubber compound molded into a symmetric tread design with straight circumferential grooves to balance dry and wet road traction with noise comfort and hydroplaning resistance. The tire's internal structure includes twin steel belts reinforced by spirally wrapped nylon to blend high-speed durability with uniform ride quality. The structure of the Turanza EL400-02 RFT features Bridgestone Side Support Run-Flat technology-reinforced sidewalls specifically tuned to support the vehicle in the case a puncture causes complete loss of air pressure.

*The P235/55RF18 99T-sized Turanza EL400-02 RFT developed for Toyota all-wheel drive Sienna minivans beginning with the 2011 model year is Bridgestone's first run-flat tire to arrive in the U.S. that features their 3rd generation run-flat tire (3G RFT) technology. The 3G RFT tires are designed to offer almost the same riding comfort as conventional tires while continuing to provide temporary extended mobility in the event a puncture allows complete air loss. While Bridgestone's "3G" identification isn't molded on the tire's sidewall or printed on its label, it is confirmed by the cooling fin technology molded into the sidewalls as shown in the accompanying photos.

Though they cannot be labeled as run-flat tires, tires branded with MOExtended or MOE on their sidewalls offer run-flat-like characteristics by delivering limited temporary extended mobility after a puncture results in complete loss of air pressure. Because MOExtended or MOE tires do not have the same speed and distance endurance of conventional run-flat tires, they should not be substituted in any situation where a conventional run-flat tire is required. To confirm what your vehicle needs, check our Original Equipment tire listing for your year, make and model or see your vehicle owner's manual.

Related Information: Learn more about MOExtended/MOE tires here.

Ratings Charts & Reviews Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT

Tire Category: Standard Touring All-Season

Consumer Surveys

 
Best in Category
Miles Reported
Recommended
Treadwear
Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT
Fair
100%
1.9M
3.6 - Poor
6.6 - Good
6.5 Hydroplaning Resistance
6.7 Wet Traction
7.5 - Good
7.3 Corner Stability
7.7 Dry Traction
7.3 Steering Response
4.5 - Poor
5.1 Light Snow Traction
4.4 Deep Snow Traction
3.9 Ice Traction
6.2 - Fair
6.4 Ride Quality
6.0 Noise
3.8 - Poor

Customers Say

Feedback patterns show the Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT delivers strong dry traction (scores 8-10) with responsive handling, meeting expectations for a touring all-season tire. However, rapid tread wear emerges as a widespread concern, with many ratings indicating disappointing tread life. Comfort receives mixed feedback, with some noting a harsh ride quality and elevated noise levels (scores 0-5). Winter traction falls short in snow/ice conditions (scores 0-5), limiting its all-season versatility. Wet traction shows split results-some praise its hydroplaning resistance (scores 7-8), while others report reduced confidence in heavy rain (scores 3-5). Dry performance remains its clearest strength for highway and fair-weather driving.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more

Customers Like:
Customers Dislike:

73 customers mention "Dry Traction"

  • 57 positive
  • 16 negative

Most customers rate dry traction highly with scores of 8-10, praising responsive handling and reliable grip. While a few lower scores exist, the Turanza EL400-02 RFT delivers confident dry performance for all-season touring.

July 14, 2024 (Verified Purchase)

5 out of 5 Star Rating
5 out of 5

I don't drive much but can report they did fine on country roads at 130 mph and at 140 mph in an extreme family emergency...

I bought them a month ago. I don't drive much but can report they did fine on country roads at 130 mph and at 140 mph in an extreme family emergency. No loud sound, no vibration.

Vehicle: 2018 Mercedes-Benz C300 4MATIC Sedan Sport Package
Miles Driven on Tires: 500
Driving Conditions: Mostly City
Location: MOHAWK, NY
Driving Style: Easy Going
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

July 12, 2020

3.8 out of 5 Star Rating
3.8 out of 5

The Bridgestone Turanza run-flat tires on my Sienna AWD have served me well for long road trips all over the country whether it was wet, snow, or dry road conditions. Of course I had to adjust my driving for the weather conditions, but the tires have never lost traction and hugged the road well.

The Bridgestone Turanza run-flat tires on my Sienna AWD have served me well for long road trips all over the country whether it was wet, snow, or dry road conditions. Of course I had to adjust my driving for the weather conditions , but the tires have never lost traction and hugged the road well.
Once I experienced a flat tire during a snow storm and was able to drive on the snowy road of about 3 inches high of fresh snow to get to a hotel about 40 miles away. It was late in the evening and the snow was icing up. Of course the van had my wife and daughter as passengers and all our luggage/ski boots..etc loaded in the back. First time I was grateful that I had these run-flats , I didn't have to get out to change the tire during the snow storm. Overall I have been satisfied with the tires and would get them again. One disadvantage, which I hear is true of all run-flat tires, is that they do wear out faster than regular non-flat tires. These run-flat tires seem to last about 40,000 to 50,000 miles before they need to be replaced.

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota Sienna AWD XLE
Miles Driven on Tires: 40,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly Highway
Location: RICHLAND, WA
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

69 customers mention "Wet Traction"

  • 33 positive
  • 36 negative

Despite some high scores (8-10), numerous ratings between 0-5 highlight unacceptable wet traction. Customers report slippery handling, a tendency to hydroplane, and feeling float on wet roads, indicating mediocre performance for an all-season tire.

April 04, 2014

2.1 out of 5 Star Rating
2.1 out of 5

...no traction -- we had spinouts that should have never happened...

What can say that previous reviewers haven't already said? My wife drives the minivan with these. It made the AWD like a 1WD. Horrible, no make that life-threatening in snow. Absolutely no traction -- we had a spinouts that should have never happened. My FWD Sienna with cheap tires performed much better in the snow. One tire had a puncture that a shop was able to patch. That same tire then literally had its sidewall cracked in half. Dealer blamed my wife for going into a pot hole, refused to address warranty, and threw tire away. At 34K miles all the tires now need to be replaced. We will replace them with conventional tires and carry a spare. DO NOT REPLACE YOUR STOCK RUN FLAT TIRES WITH THESE!

Vehicle: 2012 Toyota Sienna AWD Limited
Miles Driven on Tires: 34,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly Highway
Location: LINCOLNSHIRE, IL
Driving Style: Easy Going
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

January 23, 2019 (Verified Purchase)

2.4 out of 5 Star Rating
2.4 out of 5

...I have hydroplaned so much as I did in these tires. Dry traction was OK but not great...

These tires were the OEM on my Toyota Sienna XLE AWD. They were the worst tires I've ever drive on. The only redeeming quality is that they are run flats. We had to replace them after only 18k miles despite a 25k mile warranty. I have never hydroplaned so much as I did in these tires. Dry traction was OK but not great. Don't even consider using these in any winter weather. They are also loud and uncomfortable, something I expect from a winter tire but not an all season. I felt so unsafe driving my kids around with these on the car (I dreaded driving in rain) that we switched pretty quickly to Blizzaks (it was winter when we switched) and because of the terrible selection of RFT for the Sienna we now just keep the Blizzak LM-60 RFT on the van all the time. I replace them often but at least they are safe in winter and wet weather. I am disgusted that Toyota chose these as their OEM considering that minivans are marketed to families and they are so unsafe. Horrible, terrible, no good, very bad tire!

Vehicle: 2015 Toyota Sienna AWD XLE
Miles Driven on Tires: 18,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: ALTOONA, PA
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

March 26, 2018 (Verified Purchase)

1.5 out of 5 Star Rating
1.5 out of 5

Tires offer poor response, are loud, poor on wet roads and tread wear is also poor...

Tires offer poor response, are loud, poor on wet roads and tread wear is also poor. Not sure why toyota would pick them as OEM tire - only reason is RFT? ... any way never again. I estimate we will get less than 30,000 miles out of tire.

Vehicle: 2015 Toyota Sienna AWD Limited
Miles Driven on Tires: 23,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly City
Location: BEE CAVE, TX
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

58 customers mention "Winter Traction"

  • 16 positive
  • 42 negative

Winter traction receives many low scores (0-5), with some as low as 0-1. Customers report slippery in snow, loss of traction, and getting stuck. Lack of winter handling makes this tire unacceptable for all-season use despite occasional higher ratings.

July 20, 2011

2 out of 5 Star Rating
2 out of 5

...Also, the traction in the winter is terrible. Need to also invest in some winter RF tires to keep the family save.

We just passed 20,000 miles and get to replace the full set on our 2011 Sienna. No warranty and all the dealer can say is sorry...hearing lots of complaints on these run flat tires. Also, no options other than the Bridgestone Dueler, so will give that one a try. Completely unhappy with the tire and can't believe Toyota continues to use it. Also, the traction in the winter is terrible. Need to also invest in some winter RF tires to keep the family save.

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota Sienna AWD XLE
Miles Driven on Tires: 20,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Broomfield, CO
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

April 27, 2020

1.8 out of 5 Star Rating
1.8 out of 5

...Even brand new, traction on wet roads or even a hint of snow was horrible. We even had an expensive accident from the terrible traction after a light dusting of snow on the ground, going very slowly, it slid into a curb and cost me plenty of money replacing an A-arm...

235/55R18 RunFlat (RFT) came with my new 2019 Toyota Sienna XLE.
Worst tire I've ever owned. Even brand new, traction on wet roads or even a hint of snow was horrible. We even had an expensive accident from the terrible traction after a light dusting of snow on the ground, going very slowly, it slid into a curb and cost me plenty of money replacing an A-arm.
Even after 15k miles, these didn't feel very good. I should have replaced them sooner, but I ran them until one blew out at 32k miles.

I wish I had replaced these the moment I took possession of my new vehicle, I will never buy another set of Bridgestone if I can help it, ever, ever again.
Replacing with a high-end continental - not run-flats, and I hope to enjoy my vehicle much more once these terrible tires are out of my life.

Vehicle: 2019 Toyota Sienna AWD XLE
Miles Driven on Tires: 32,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: THORNTON, CO
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

April 11, 2015

2.4 out of 5 Star Rating
2.4 out of 5

...Absolutely hate them! ... poor winter traction.

Original equipment tires. Absolutely hate them! Noisy, harsh ride, poor winter traction.

Vehicle: 2014 Mercedes-Benz E350 4MATIC Sedan
Miles Driven on Tires: 9,500
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: ROWLEY, MA
Driving Style: Easy Going
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

76 customers mention "Ride Quality"

  • 34 positive
  • 42 negative

While some customers rate comfort highly with 9s and 10s, many report harsh ride and unbearable road noise, with scores between 0-6 indicating low comfort for a touring tire.

August 08, 2012

2 out of 5 Star Rating
2 out of 5

...The ride quality is horrible and you can feel every single bump in the road. Very stiff ride and noisy to boot. Compared to the Michelin Energy Tires we replaced them with they ride like Rocks...

We got these on our new 2011 Sienna AWD. We had to replace ALL FOUR of these tires today. They lasted 12,000 Miles. We have also had two flats in the last two months with these tires and the second one could not be patched. The ride quality is horrible and you can feel every single bump in the road. Very stiff ride and noisy to boot. Compared to the Michelin "Energy" Tires we replaced them with they ride like Rocks.

All in all, I'd say these new "run flats" will probably not be around in a few years. Both the Tire Shop (who couldn't find one anywhere) and the Dealer all say they are notorious for getting poor mileage and for getting ruined if you actually DO drive on them when they are flat. They are also very hard to find. Even good old Tire Rack didn't have them in stock today. In the end, we decided to just get a good set of Michelin "Energy" Tires and carry a can of "Fix a Flat" in the car. The Run Flats are a disaster. I suggest you wear out all four (which won't take long) and replace them all with another brand.

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota Sienna AWD Limited
Miles Driven on Tires: 12,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: Cupertino, CA
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

December 08, 2013

1 out of 5 Star Rating
1 out of 5

...The noise is terrible, the comfort is non-existent...

Possibly the worst tires ever made, the new car I am interested in buying also come with these junk tires and I am getting the chills.
After 15000 miles already 3 tires got punctured and at 27000 miles they are all worn out. The noise is terrible, the comfort is non-existent.
Three words describe these tires JUNK JUNK JUNK.

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota Sienna AWD
Miles Driven on Tires: 27,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: GREAT NECK, NY
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

April 14, 2014

2 out of 5 Star Rating
2 out of 5

I checked the tires and the radials are showing at 32K miles. I can't believe they are so worn after only 32K miles. Piece of garbage, but what is my alternative?...

I would only purchase these tires again, because I can't find any other. My wife primarily drives my minivan and she told me the other day that she thinks she needs new tires. I checked the tires and the radials are showing at 32K miles. I can't believe they are so worn after only 32K miles. Piece of garbage, but what is my alternative? I can't take my chance on getting a flat tire. NEVER again will I buy a vehicle with no room for a spare. THANKS TOYOTA!

Vehicle: 2011 Toyota AWD LE
Miles Driven on Tires: 32,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: OAK RIDGE, NJ
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

68 customers mention "Treadwear"

  • 12 positive
  • 56 negative

Frequent low scores (0-3) indicate widespread dissatisfaction with tread life. Many report rapid wear, premature replacement, and mileage below expectations despite some 8-10 ratings. Disappointed customers note excessive wear and needing early replacement.

December 14, 2016 (Verified Purchase)

2.4 out of 5 Star Rating
2.4 out of 5

...We have 28k miles and have stayed on top of regular maintenance. They already need to be replaced and one is showing wire. At roughly $1000 to replace this is ridiculous!...

Awful tires! Never buying again! They came factory on our vehicle. We have 28k miles and have stayed on top of regular maintenance. They already need to be replaced and one is showing wire. At roughly $1000 to replace this is ridiculous! I shouldn't need to buy tires every 25k miles. I contacted Bridgestone and it's been 3 days with no response from them. Poor product and bad customer service.

Vehicle: 2015 Toyota Sienna AWD Limited
Miles Driven on Tires: 28,000
Driving Conditions: Combined Highway/City
Location: VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

July 16, 2015

2.8 out of 5 Star Rating
2.8 out of 5

Tires got to about 20,000 miles and became rock hard stiff and very noisy. Now at 26,000 and Im replacing them tomorrow, just cant take the louisy ride anymore...

Tires got to about 20,000 miles and became rock hard stiff and very noisy. Now at 26,000 and Im replacing them tomorrow, just cant take the louisy ride anymore. Could never recommend these

Vehicle: 2012 BMW 328i Sedan Base Model
Miles Driven on Tires: 26,000
Driving Conditions: Mostly Highway
Location: CYPRESS, TX
Driving Style: Average
Was this review helpful?
Yes No
You found this review helpful.
You did not find this review helpful.
Updating...
This is your own survey.

While you can't rate your own survey, you can:

Consumer Reviews

SERVICE WITH A SMILE

Need help choosing the right products for your vehicle? Our US-based team of highly trained experts has the knowledge and passion to help. Just pick up the phone and give us a ring. Or let's chat via email. We love solving problems and lending a hand (or an ear).

Contact Us
Three smiling Tire Rack employees